1
|
- City of Lawrence, Kansas
- August 3, 2006
|
2
|
- Document current workload and service demands.
- Evaluate service levels.
- Evaluate the role of the various departments, current practices and activities, and emerging
issues.
- Evaluate the organization of the departments and the staffing
requirements.
- Comparison of existing services to “best practices” and to comparable
communities.
|
3
|
- All staff involved in the development review process were interviewed.
- Existing development review services were documented.
- Focus group meetings were held with customers.
- Services provided were compared to ‘best management practices’ and to
comparable communities.
|
4
|
- The project team reviewed interim findings and results with the project
steering committee consisting of representatives of the:
- Affected Departments
- City Commission
- Planning Commission
- County
|
5
|
- Utilization of an inter-departmental review committee.
- Concurrent plan review of planning permits.
- Use of case managers to coordinate permit applications and projects.
- Utilization of Planner of the Day.
- Utilization of application handouts for the public outlining submittal
requirements.
|
6
|
- The utilization of combination Building Inspectors (for residential).
- Utilization of the internet for application materials and guides,
regulations, and ordinances.
- Ability for contractors to utilize the internet and IVR (interactive
voice response) systems to schedule inspections and receive inspection
results.
|
7
|
- Several changes have been implemented recently to improve the process
including:
- Addition of a new planner position (Planning Department)
- Changes in duty assignments for development review staff in Public
Works.
- Addition of position in Utilities for development review.
- Implementation of IVR (interactive voice response) system (Neighborhood
Resources)
- Implementation of Permit Technician position and dedicated Plans
Examiner position (Neighborhood Resources)
|
8
|
- Upgrade the automated permit information system to enable all
departments involved in development review to track and manage work
activities.
- Develop RFP and seek proposals to evaluate all automated permit information systems
that are available.
- Make decision whether to implement a new system or upgrade existing HTE
software (implementing the Planning and Engineering modules, and
expanded use of Click2Gov module to provide services over the
internet.)
|
9
|
- Enhance the utilization of the automated permit information system in
the following areas:
- All departments involved in processing, commenting on, and approving
development review applications should utilize the system;
- Tracking of critical dates to enable monitoring of the service levels
being provided;
- Storing all plan check comments, annotations, and comments digitally
attached to the database record for that application.
|
10
|
- Establish plan check targets tied to the complexity of the project:
- Large Projects: 4 weeks
- Small Projects: 3 weeks
- Tenant Finish, Minor Additions:
1-2 weeks
- Misc. Small Permits: Over the
counter
- Increase the time in the field for Building Inspectors by relieving them of some office or
administrative functions (such as
plan checking) through the
addition of two Plan Examiner positions.
|
11
|
- Utilize the Internet to issue single trade building permits on the
Internet (target 10%).
- Adopt the most current ICC
building codes.
- Develop a codes interpretation manual to provide information to
customers and increase inspection consistency. Publish this manual on the Internet.
- Publish plan check checklists and common plan check corrections on the
Internet.
- Expand the use of the combination Building Inspector approach.
|
12
|
- Expand the number of building permits issued over-the-counter to include
single-family additions and interior work; outdoor spas; new roof
framing; interior finishes for minor office and retail projects.
(Target: 50%)
|
13
|
- Establishment and publication of timeframes for review of permit plans
submitted such as:
- Design Review 30 days
- Variance 45 days
- Use Permit 45 days
- Conditional Use Permit 120 days
- Development Review 120 days
- Preliminary / Final Plan 120 days
|
14
|
- Establish standard conditions of approval for all departments to enhance
consistency and publish these to the Internet.
- Add two Planner positions to enable the department to handle workload
and consistently meet timeframes.
- Develop an interpretations manual for the new Zoning ordinance published
to the Internet.
- Clarify the role and responsibility of the Planning Commission.
|
15
|
- Upgrade two existing positions to Senior Planner to enhance supervision
of advanced and current planning, and enable two management positions to
focus on policy issues and management of the department.
|
16
|
- Consolidate responsibility for plan review functions in one position to
streamline the process and eliminate four different staff plan checking
the plans.
- Locate this position in the One-Stop Shop.
|
17
|
- Consolidate plan review functions with one position to streamline the
process and eliminate multiple staff plan checking the plans.
- Locate this position in the One-Stop Shop.
- Consolidate traffic plan checking performed by both the Traffic Planner
and the Traffic Engineer in
Planning with the Traffic Planner.
|
18
|
- Locate all staff involved in development review in a One-Stop Shop. This
would include:
- Planning
- Neighborhood Resources
- Fire (currently co-located with Neighborhood Resources)
- Utilities
- Public Works
|
19
|
- Consolidate Planning and Neighborhood Resources departments into one
department - a Community Development Department - with one department
head responsible for managing the entire development review process.
- Discuss with Douglas County the
co-location of its Building and Zoning Enforcement staff in the
City’s One-Stop Shop
- Discuss with Douglas County the provision of additional services
cooperatively (such as Building Inspection).
|
20
|
- The City is currently providing a good level of service to the public
and development community.
- Recommendations are focused on enhancing that level of
service, simplifying and streamlining the process, expanding services
provided over the Internet, and ensuring consistency and transparency in
the process.
|
21
|
- The major opportunities for improvement include:
- Expanded use of automated permit information system by all departments
involved in development review function
- Upgrading the automated permit information system
- Enhanced accountability for
service delivery
- Co-location of development review services in a One-Stop Shop
- Increased and reorganized levels of staffing
- Discussions with County regarding co-location and possible increase in
the cooperative provision of services.
|