Memorandum

City of Lawrence

Planning & Development Services

 

TO:

David L. Corliss, City Manager

 

FROM:

Brian Jimenez, Code Enforcement Manager

 

CC:

Scott McCullough, Director Planning & Development Services

 

Date:

November 10, 2010

 

RE:

214 N. 6th St.– Abatement of exterior yard code violations update

 

 

On November 3, 2010, the Code Enforcement Division executed an administrative search warrant to enter the subject property to clean up the exterior yard code violations.  Prior to this enforcement action, staff had worked several code cases over the last several years involving this property.  The most recent case resulted in the City Commission adopting Resolution No. 6886, which authorized staff to abate the violations located on the property. 

 

Staff contracted with the city’s mowing contractor to perform the abatement which began at 9:00 a.m. on November 3rd.  Four Code Enforcement staff participated in the clean up in order to reduce costs and to accelerate the time required to abate the nuisance conditions.  Staff and the contractor concluded the abatement at 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 4th.  Below is a summary of the tonnage removed, work hours completed and the costs associated with the abatement.  Photos of the before and after conditions are attached.

 

This property had significant amounts of materials to abate.  The property is 0.39 acres and the numbers below demonstrate the severity of the conditions on the property.

 

Summary of Abatement by the Numbers

 

Ø  The filling of 6 large city roll off dumpsters that resulted in 16.54 tons being collected.

Ø  The filling of 4 roll off dumpsters provided by Lonnie’s Recycling which resulted in 5 tons of scrap metal being recycled rather than being taken to the land fill.

Ø  Staff received $449.10 dollars from Lonnie’s which will be subtracted from the total costs of the abatement.

 

Ø  16.54 tons at $19.15 per ton = $316.74

Ø  Total of 6 “pulls” on roll offs to land fill at $182.40 = $1094.40

Ø  Total amount of service provided = $1,411.14

 

Ø  Of these hours, staff worked 46 hours which saved the City $1,840 dollars in labor costs. 

Ø  Labor costs accrued by contractor = $2,120.00 (53 hours)

Ø  Total costs accrued by the City

= $1,411.14 + $2120.00 - $449.10 = $3082.04

 

v  Staff will assess work hours performed by staff against the property owner as outlined in Section 9-613 of the Environmental Code in the manner provided in K.S.A. 12-16a17.